stockmarket

Here’s why I think the Lloyds share price has further to fall



Profits and dividends at Lloyds (LSE: LLOY) have gone from strength to strength over the last few years. Meanwhile, the share price has gone nowhere. Indeed, it’s down 16% so far this year, and is 36% below its post-financial-crisis high made in the summer of 2015.

The firm posted a forecast-beating profit in its Q3 results on Thursday. But the shares remain mired below 60p. I’ve been bearish on the stock for a good while, but has it become too cheap to ignore? Its price-to-tangible-net-assets ratio of 1.1 appears low for a thriving bank. Its forward price-to-earnings ratio of 7.5 is in the bargain basement. And its prospective dividend yield of 5.7% is appealingly high. What’s not to like?

Canaries in the mine
My main concern about Lloyds is the risk posed by the historically unprecedented UK consumer debt bubble. Wages have fallen in real terms since the financial crisis but consumers have continued to spend, helping to keep the economy ticking by running down their savings and racking up debt to staggering levels. I don’t see this as sustainable.

In its Q3 results on Thursday, Lloyds said: “Credit quality across the portfolio remains strong with no deterioration in credit risk.” And this was echoed by Royal Bank of Scotland (LON:) on Friday, which said: “Underlying credit conditions remained benign during the quarter.”

However, it’s the nature of bubbles that everything looks fine until they burst. But I do see some indications that the bubble may be getting stretched. The table below shows a rising trend in Lloyds’ rolling 12-month impairment of loans for each quarter since the start of 2017.

Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018
Impairment (£m) 623 668 734 795 926 983 997

And I’m spotting canaries in the mine elsewhere. For example retailer Next, which has a £1.1bn customer debtor book, recently reported the emergence of “a leading indicator for increasing bad debt rates.”

Paragon of prudence
As Warren Buffett said when the last financial crisis hit: “You only learn who has been swimming naked when the tide goes out.” Close Brothers is a fine example of a conservatively-managed bank. It was able to maintain its dividend through the last crisis. How does Lloyds’ current positioning compare with that of this paragon of prudence?

In its quest for growth, Lloyds has upped its unsecured lending, notably with the acquisition of UK consumer credit card business MBNA last year. In the current year to date, the Black Horse has increased credit card lending by £600m to £18.5bn. At the same time, retail unsecured loans and ‘retail other’, which includes overdrafts, were each up £100m to £7.9bn and £9.5bn, respectively. Motor finance is also a current growth focus. Lending is up £900m since the start of the year to £14.4bn, with £500m of that coming in Q3.

In contrast, Close Brothers has recently reduced its exposure to unsecured lending, selling a business it had developed in the unsecured retail point-of-sale finance market. And while Lloyds is revving up UK motor financing, Close Brothers was recently content to report a small contraction in its car loans book, noting “we continue to prioritise margin and credit quality in a highly competitive market.”

On balance, I’m not quite persuaded that Lloyds’ cheap valuation is cheap enough for the potential risks ahead. As such, I’ll continue to avoid the stock at this stage.

G A Chester has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Lloyds Banking Group (LON:). Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.





READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.