autos

LETTERS: The energy to charge electric cars; access to health care – Colorado Springs Gazette


The energy to charge electric cars

Concerning the picture of Gov. Jared Polis plugging “an electric vehicle into a charging station before announcing executive orders aimed at increasing the number of zero-emission vehicles on state roads at a news conference Jan. 17 in Denver” in the Sunday, April 14, issue of The Gazette:

How did the charging station get its energy to charge the car? Was it by solar or windfarm? Or could the source be fossil fuel?

Yes, there are batteries because solar doesn’t work well with no sun and the windfarm doesn’t do well without wind. The energy from these two sources would have to be stored in batteries, wouldn’t it? What is the source of the electricity to “charge” this automobile or the basis of the transmission of this electricity?

I am no expert on this, but I haven’t seen nor heard how the energy gets from the solar panel or the windfarm windmills to charge the electric car.

Just a quick thought

So just this quick thought. Electric cars are purchased with a subsidy from the federal government. If they raise the fuel tax to fix infrastructure aren’t these cars getting around paying their share? Perhaps take away the subsidy to offset what is not collected on these cars.

Embracing the ‘protest culture’

Using the premise of “support”, the AFA has embedded itself in “the culture,” by way of participating in “Denim Day”.

According to AFA officials, the intent is to show solidarity with college students worldwide in support of sexual assault victims, but this is, for all intents and purposes, a “protest” in response to a legal decision of the Italian Supreme Court to overturn a 1998 rape conviction.

Now that the AFA has fully embraced the “protest culture”, I can only assume that Denim Day will now be on the AFA calendar each year. And since they have decided to dive head first into the “woke” culture in protesting a foreign country’s judicial system, can we also look forward to other protest days (or rather, “support” days) such as “Burka Day”, where cadets wear burkas to protest the worldwide repression of women? Perhaps wearing black T-shirts on a “Black Lives Matter” Day to protest the repression of blacks in America? An “Easter Worshipper” Day to protest the murder of scores of Christians in Sri Lanka? A “No Chains” Day on June 7, to protest the chain-dragging murder of James Byrd?

Congratulations, AFA. You now own it all. Your lack of participation in any of the above scenarios (and more) will now been perceived as indifference, if you do not address them and fully participate in them.

The question is, just where will you find the time for the syllabus? You know, the reason the cadets are there in the first place.

Maintain access to health care

The recent Texas v. United States lawsuit spearheaded by 20 Republican state officials and supported by the Trump administration would scrap the Affordable Care Act, including Medicaid expansion. If the lawsuit prevails, a significant portion of Coloradans who have gained coverage through expansion would lose it.

But it’s not just coverage for Coloradans who rely on Medicaid expansion that’s under threat; President Donald Trump’s recent budget proposal includes trillions of dollars in cuts to the entire Medicaid program as part of a plan to turn traditional Medicaid into a per capita cap.

Ongoing efforts to sabotage and repeal the Affordable Care Act put these Coloradans at risk of losing the care they depend on, which would have a devastating ripple effect in families across the state.

Our representatives in Congress have a responsibility to protect our health care, which means standing up against attacks on Medicaid. Unfortunately, Sen. Cory Gardner has failed Coloradans time and time again by voting to confirm anti-health care judges, refusing to intervene in the Texas lawsuit, and allowing the president’s attacks on Medicaid to go unchallenged.

We need our leaders to protect the Affordable Care Act and funding for Medicaid to maintain access to health care for the Coloradans who rely on them.

Return on an investment?

If this is the return on the investment for allowing Kim Jong Un a propaganda event with our president meeting with him, we must surely rethink the direction of our foreign policy. If not, the direction of our present leadership.



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.