security

Privacy and security risks with genetic tests like 23andMe, Ancestry – Business Insider


caption
While the spit you ship to a genetic testing company is supposed to stay private, it’s getting easier to match your DNA to your name.
source
Hollis Johnson/Business Insider
  • It may be getting easier to link your private and anonymized

    DNA data
    to your identity.
  • That means the
    genetic data you share
    with a testing company – which may
    include sensitive health information like your risk of cancer –
    could one day be matched with your name by an unintended party.
  • While some
    at-home DNA tests
    like 23andMe have
    privacy protocols
    to protect against this, they’re not a
    guarantee, experts say. Other companies have fewer
    safeguards
    .
  • One key issue is the ability for users to upload their
    private DNA data to publicly-accessible genetic databases like
    the one used in the Golden State Killer case.

The data you shared with a
genetic testing
startup like 23andMe is private – for now.

But maintaining that privacy, which rests on
your data
being kept anonymous and secure, is getting harder,
according to privacy experts, bioethicists, and entrepreneurs.

Your DNA data contains highly sensitive information about your

health
and identity. Everything from your ancestry to your
risk of cancer to information about allergies and predisposition
to Alzheimer’s are often included in a genetic test report.
Whether it’s a political figure claiming indigenous heritage or a
CEO with a genetic risk for mental illness, any one of these
factors could be used against someone if they got into the wrong
hands.

The most prolific genetic testing companies take thorough steps
to protect your privacy, such as scraping personal identifiers
like your name from your genetic code before they sell that data
to researchers or drug companies. They also typically store your
personal information and your genetic data in separate
environments to protect against a potential hack.

But those protocols do not protect against several key
vulnerabilities, experts say.

One involves what can happen to the data outside of the
tough-to-define walls of a
DNA testing
service. While genetic testing companies can and
frequently do
share anonymized genetic data
with researchers and drug
companies, individual users can also upload their private,
non-anonymous DNA reports to public databases like GEDmatch. That
service, which was used to
home in
on the Golden State Killer suspect, allows for the
identification of relatives who haven’t even taken a genetic
test.

Even large pools of anonymized genetic data can theoretically be
tied to an individual. For at least the past decade, researchers
have demonstrated that by cross-referencing anonymous DNA data
with datasets that include personal information, such voter or
census rolls, they can correctly “re-identify” significant
portions of participants.

Read More   Tech chills spill into Asia, as shares sink across region - The Associated Press

Plus, most of the leading genetic testing services allow
customers to download their raw genetic data – the As, Gs, Ts,
and Cs that make up their genetic code – using their email and
profile login.

Privacy experts and bioethicists say all of these issues make the
current landscape of genetic testing ripe for potential calamity.

“This is not video games that can be downloaded and shared
without your permission, or even bank information,” Matt
Mitchell, the director of digital safety and privacy for advocacy
organization Tactical Tech, told Business Insider.

“You can cancel your credit card. You can’t change your DNA,” he
added.

The case of the Golden State Killer: how private and protected
DNA data can be exploited in public databases

Golden State Killer

source
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

When you mail your saliva sample to a company like 23andMe,
Ancestry, Helix, or any one of a handful of current
DNA testing startups
, they run an analysis of the genetic
data it contains. That
DNA data
includes your unique genetic code and it also
includes your ancestry data, which can point to relatives.

To protect your privacy, most of these companies make that data
anonymous: they remove your personal information, such as your
name, from the data, and they store the DNA data separately from
your personal information.

Spokespeople from Ancestry, 23andMe, and Helix all told Business
Insider that their privacy policies are designed to protect
people’s data within the walls of their platforms. But what
happens outside of their domains is up to the individual
customer.

In the
case
of the Golden State Killer, law enforcement agents
uploaded their suspect’s DNA to the open personal genomics and
genealogy database GEDmatch using a sample from a crime scene.
Then, with the help of a team of experts, they were able to comb
through and compare several sets of data until they found their
suspect, Joseph James DeAngelo. Key to their discovery was the
fact that
24 of DeAngelo’s relatives
had participated in GEDmatch.

You share a lot of your DNA with your parents and siblings, and
less with more distant relatives. But by comparing an anonymous
DNA sample with identified ones, researchers can triangulate in
on a person’s relatives, and then, identify the person
themselves.

None of the leading genetic testing companies allow users to
upload raw DNA samples like GEDmatch does. But you can download
your Ancestry or 23andMe genetic data and share it with GEDmatch
or another public genealogy database.

“Today when you have a de-identified dataset and a complementary
resource you can compare that data with – such as something like
GEDmatch – you can begin to identify individuals from that,”
James
Hazel
, a biomedical researcher at Vanderbilt University who
recently reviewed the privacy policies of several genetic testing
companies, told Business Insider.

Read More   Social Media & Cyber Security: Why Students Should Be Aware of Publishing Something on Social Media - TechPluto

‘Data is data – once it’s out there, it’s very hard to control’

DNA Testing 23andMe

source
Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

Until very recently, researchers considered the risk of
re-identification – when someone correctly matches your anonymous
DNA data with your personal information – to be extremely low.
But as more people participate in genetic testing and as data
analysis tools become faster and easier to use, this risk is on
the rise, they say.

Hazel said the current risk of re-identification is
“significant.”

Dawn Barry, the president and cofounder of genetic research
startup LunaDNA and a 12-year veteran of biotech giant Illumina,
agreed.

“We need to prepare for a future in which re-identification is
possible,” she told Business Insider during a meeting on the
sidelines of a health conference organized by the Wall Street
Journal.

Since roughly 2009, researchers have demonstrated that by
comparing large sets of
supposedly anonymous
DNA data with public datasets from
censuses or voter lists, they could
correctly identify
between 40% and 60% of
all genetic testing participants.

DNA databases have grown significantly since that 2009
experiment.

As of last fall, more than
19 million
people had taken a private Ancestry or 23andMe
test. On the heels of their
growth
, participation in public databases like Promethease
and GEDmatch have ballooned as

well
.

“Data is data – once it’s out there, it’s very hard to control,”
Hazel said.

David Koepsell, a Yale bioethicist and the cofounder and CEO of
blockchain-enabled genomics company EncrypGen, agreed.

“Re-identification is a real concern and people have done it with
public databases. It’s not science fiction,” he told Business
Insider.

Last November, Yaniv Erlich, a geneticist and the chief science
officer of ancestry company MyHeritage, led a study
published in the journal Science in which he looked at DNA data
from GEDmatch and MyHeritage. Erlich concluded that with a
genetic database of 1.3 million US residents, roughly 60% of all
white Americans could be traced to a third cousin. This finding
was independent of whether people had themseleves participated in
a genetic test.

“In the near future,” Erlich wrote in the paper, “the technique
could implicate nearly any US individual of European descent.”

Spokespeople from Ancestry, 23andMe, and Helix all outlined
comprehensive privacy policies that are designed to protect
people’s data when their data remains within the platforms.

Read More   Employee errors responsible for half of cybersecurity incidents: Report - Hindustan Times

“To protect against re-identification, we strip customers’
personally identifiable information from their genetic
information, storing the two sets of data in separate, walled-off
computing environments,” a 23andMe representative told Business
Insider via email.

Helix and Ancestry spokespeople shared similar policies.

‘It could go wrong’: Experts warn against downloading your
personal DNA data

Helix DNA 7

caption
Many people participate in genetic research under the assumption that they’re anonymous, but that’s tough to guarantee.
source
Hollis Johnson

But Ancestry, 23andMe, and Helix all allow
users to download their raw DNA data. The download is free from
Ancestry and 23andMe but costs $499 with Helix. A Helix
spokesperson said the fee was because Helix provides a more
comprehensive genetic dataset than the other platforms.

In most cases to download their DNA data, a user must log into
the platform and select “download my raw DNA.” Then they get an
email where they must confirm the download. After clicking
confirm, a text file download begins.

23andme raw data download screenshot

source
Business Insider / Erin Brodwin

Once a customer downloads their genetic data, however, it is no
longer protected by any of company’s security measures.

“What you do with your data is your responsibility, whether that
means sharing your login name and password with others, sharing
through 23andMe, downloading your data or anything else,”
23andMe’s website reads.

Experts say this setup does not adequately protect users. At
minimum, they say the platforms should encrypt the genetic data
from the time it is sent to the time it is received. They also
pointed out that a person’s login information may be the same as
their email, another potential security weakness.

“This is Privacy 101,” Mitchell told Business Insider. “These
companies need to have the highest level of security and they
don’t.”

Mitchell and Hazel both said they believed genetic testing
companies should use two-factor or multi-factor authentication, a
security step enforced by many banks and data companies. It
requires users to give two or more pieces of evidence (such as
their phone number and a pin) before allowing access to sensitive
data.

“This is something a lot of companies do,” said Mitchell. “If
someone really cares about your data they’re going to handle it
with the utmost caution. Downloading raw data is dangerous and it
could go wrong.”

Hazel thinks more users should be aware of these vulnerabilities,
as well as the various ways their data may be used that go beyond
their initial intentions.

“It comes down to the trade-off,” he said. “How comfortable are
you with how the data might be shared and used?”





READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.