startups

Short flexible leases pose big risk to co-living startups – PropertyGuru Singapore


A majority of co-living startups rent their residential units from landlords, then later sublet the units. Analysts believe that this business model is extremely volatile. 

Short flexible leases could be co-living’s largest risk factor in its business model, reported Business Times.

Analysts said despite such leases being considered as one of co-living’s main draws, co-living startups should be cautious of the volatility in its revenue streams due to a mismatch between shorter-termed rental agreements with tenants and longer-termed leases signed with landlords.

Paired with a highly mobile target group, such as expatriates and millennials, these models face the possibility of becoming liable for their leases without having secured tenants for the whole duration.

A majority of co-living startups rent their residential units from landlords, then later sublet bedrooms in these units, coupled with shared amenities and facilities such as gyms and kitchens.

Just like co-working, co-living aims to create a sense of community among residents via regular community events organised by operators.

Co-living operators, however, face risks with this setup.

Liu Gen Ping, fund manager at Vertex Ventures, noted that a full sublet model such as this will have fixed operating costs, making the startups “more vulnerable to a downturn”.

Co-living companies permit tenants to lease units for short-term periods, with many of them having a staggered fee structure and featuring lower rates for longer stays.

The startups often sign long term leases with landlords while earning money from low-commitment monthly rents.

READ: 6 Reasons Why Co-Living In Singapore WON’T Be Here To Stay

“This model is much riskier than co-working since individuals have greater mobility compared to businesses. The risk of coming short on revenue is much higher,” said a spokesman at Openspace Ventures.

Some co-living startups, though, can use revenue-sharing models to reduce risks. Under revenue-sharing lease agreements, the operators pay the landlords a proportion of the property’s turnover.

This turns the pressure over to the landlords, as the income is not predictable and makes it tougher to leverage other financing mechanisms to engineer a stable return, according to Liu.

By offering a potentially volatile and uneven income stream instead of a fixed and steady one, leases like this changes the bond-like nature of property as an asset and into something more similar to an equity.

For co-living startups to operate on models like this, they would need to establish its credibility and have enough scale to attract landlords. It will not help if landlords do not see the co-living concept as taking off here.

Despite the co-living space remaining measured since 2010 with only a few players offering limited units, demand remains high.

Companies such as Hmlet, Cove and Commontown said their occupancy rates are around 90% to 95%, despite having premium rental rates.

These occupancy rates “seem reasonable and achievable”, because the supply of co-living spaces is still limited. However, these high rates might see a decline once the supply increases.

“The key risk is whether they can keep this occupancy rate as high as they scale supply,” Openspace Venture’s spokesman said.

“The co-living model is sustainable only if the model can improve the efficiency in matching its space and the users, and the use of technology is one way to overcome the physical constraints in traditional rental markets,” said Foo Sing Tien, Institute of Real Estate and Urban Studies (IREUS) director for NUS.

By increasing value, meeting key needs of their target market and maximising cost effectiveness, co-living startups can be inside the sweet spot and generate profit.

Looking for a property in Singapore? Visit PropertyGuru’s ListingsProject Reviews and Guides.

 

Victor Kang, Digital Content Specialist at PropertyGuru, edited this story. To contact him about this or other stories, email victorkang@propertyguru.com.sg



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.