enterprise

Will the Promising Trends At Getac Technology (TPE:3005) Continue? – Simply Wall St


What trends should we look for it we want to identify stocks that can multiply in value over the long term? Firstly, we’d want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it’s a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. So on that note, Getac Technology (TPE:3005) looks quite promising in regards to its trends of return on capital.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

For those who don’t know, ROCE is a measure of a company’s yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Getac Technology:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

0.15 = NT$2.9b ÷ (NT$30b – NT$11b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2020).

So, Getac Technology has an ROCE of 15%. In absolute terms, that’s a satisfactory return, but compared to the Tech industry average of 9.5% it’s much better.

View our latest analysis for Getac Technology

roce
TSEC:3005 Return on Capital Employed August 10th 2020

In the above chart we have a measured Getac Technology’s prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you’re interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

How Are Returns Trending?

Getac Technology has not disappointed with their ROCE growth. Looking at the data, we can see that even though capital employed in the business has remained relatively flat, the ROCE generated has risen by 155% over the last five years. Basically the business is generating higher returns from the same amount of capital and that is proof that there are improvements in the company’s efficiencies. The company is doing well in that sense, and it’s worth investigating what the management team has planned for long term growth prospects.

The Bottom Line On Getac Technology’s ROCE

To bring it all together, Getac Technology has done well to increase the returns it’s generating from its capital employed. And a remarkable 207% total return over the last five years tells us that investors are expecting more good things to come in the future. So given the stock has proven it has promising trends, it’s worth researching the company further to see if these trends are likely to persist.

On a final note, we’ve found 1 warning sign for Getac Technology that we think you should be aware of.

While Getac Technology isn’t earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

Promoted
When trading Getac Technology or any other investment, use the platform considered by many to be the Professional’s Gateway to the Worlds Market, Interactive Brokers. You get the lowest-cost* trading on stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

Discounted cash flow calculation for every stock

Simply Wall St does a detailed discounted cash flow calculation every 6 hours for every stock on the market, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any company just search here. It’s FREE.



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply